{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","generatedAt":"2026-07-23T07:21:26.498Z","headline":"AI文本检测器在模仿作者风格时漏检率飙升","description":"Epoch AI研究显示，Pangram、GPTZero和Originality.ai检测普通AI文本近乎完美，假阴性率最高仅0.7%。但当Claude Opus 4.8等模型模仿特定作者风格写作时，平均13%的AI文本未被检出；科学写作类别中漏检率高达24%-29%，Pangram对Gemini生成的学术文本漏检率达48%。","url":"https://www.aioga.com/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","mainEntityOfPage":"https://www.aioga.com/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","datePublished":"2026-07-19T08:35:26.000Z","dateModified":"2026-07-19T08:35:26.000Z","inLanguage":"zh-CN","publisher":{"@type":"NewsMediaOrganization","name":"Aioga","url":"https://www.aioga.com"},"citation":["https://the-decoder.com/ai-text-detectors-struggle-when-language-models-mimic-an-authors-style","https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h"],"canonicalUrl":"https://www.aioga.com/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","directAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Aioga 编辑摘要：Epoch AI研究显示，Pangram、GPTZero和Originality.ai检测普通AI文本近乎完美，假阴性率最高仅0.7%。 Aioga 将其归入「论文研究」方向，重点关注它对真实使用和行业竞争的影响。","url":"https://www.aioga.com/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","dateCreated":"2026-07-19T08:35:26.000Z","author":{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://www.aioga.com/authors/aioga-editorial/#editorial-team","name":"Aioga Editorial Team","url":"https://www.aioga.com/authors/aioga-editorial/"}},"evidence":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"the-decoder.com source article","url":"https://the-decoder.com/ai-text-detectors-struggle-when-language-models-mimic-an-authors-style","datePublished":"2026-07-19T08:35:26.000Z","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"the-decoder.com","url":"https://the-decoder.com/ai-text-detectors-struggle-when-language-models-mimic-an-authors-style"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"AIHot archive record","url":"https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h","datePublished":"2026-07-19T08:35:26.000Z","provider":{"@type":"Organization","name":"AIHot","url":"https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h"}}],"aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","originalPublisher":{"name":"the-decoder.com","url":"https://the-decoder.com/ai-text-detectors-struggle-when-language-models-mimic-an-authors-style"},"article":{"id":"cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h","slug":"cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h","url":"https://www.aioga.com/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","title":"AI文本检测器在模仿作者风格时漏检率飙升","title_en":"AI text detectors struggle when language models mimic an author's style","summary":"Epoch AI研究显示，Pangram、GPTZero和Originality.ai检测普通AI文本近乎完美，假阴性率最高仅0.7%。但当Claude Opus 4.8等模型模仿特定作者风格写作时，平均13%的AI文本未被检出；科学写作类别中漏检率高达24%-29%，Pangram对Gemini生成的学术文本漏检率达48%。","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","sourceUrl":"https://the-decoder.com/ai-text-detectors-struggle-when-language-models-mimic-an-authors-style","aiHotUrl":"https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h","publishedAt":"2026-07-19T08:35:26.000Z","category":"论文研究","score":57,"selected":false,"articleBody":["Popular AI text detectors catch plain AI-generated text with near-perfect accuracy. But when language models deliberately copy a specific author's writing style, up to one in five AI texts slips through undetected. Scientific writing is where the detectors fail the hardest.","A research team from Epoch AI tested three of the most widely used AI text detectors: Pangram (version 3.3.2), GPTZero (model 2026-05-11-base), and Originality.ai (Turbo 3.0.2). The test covered three categories: genuine human writing, AI text generated from simple prompts, and AI text that deliberately mimicked a specific author's style.","The team built a corpus of 495 human passages from 99 authors, evenly split across blogging, fiction, and scientific writing. All texts were written before ChatGPT's release in November 2022, which effectively rules out contamination by language models. Ad","When dealing with plain AI-generated text, all three detectors performed almost flawlessly：https://epoch.ai/data-insights/ai-text-detection-challenges, with the false-negative rate topping out at 0.7 percent. Human texts were also classified correctly for the most part. Pangram and GPTZero didn't produce a single false alarm. Originality.ai, however, flagged 19 out of 495 human passages as AI-generated, a troublingly high false-positive rate of 3.8 percent. Ad DEC_D_Incontent-1","That result changes when language models receive writing samples from an author as reference material. For this test, three frontier models (Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro) each received five real text passages from an author and were asked to write new text in the same style.","Of the 297 passages generated this way, an average of 38 went undetected, according to Epoch AI, which works out to a false-negative rate of about 13 percent. Pangram missed 10 percent of style-imitated texts, GPTZero missed 11 percent, and Originality.ai missed 18 percent. Ad","For fiction, the false-negative rate across all detectors sat at just 1 to 5 percent. scientific writing told a very different story. Pangram failed to catch 25 percent of style-imitated academic AI texts, GPTZero missed 24 percent, and Originality.ai missed 29 percent.","The worst individual results showed up in specific model-genre combinations within scientific writing. Pangram missed 48 percent of Gemini-generated academic passages, according to the published data：https://github.com/jaeholee-brown/ai-text-detectors. At Originality.ai, 39 percent of academic GPT-5.5 texts went undetected. Ad DEC_D_Incontent-2","Pangram uses a neural network trained on human and machine-generated text, though its founder has called the system a black box：https://the-decoder.com/pangram-ceo-says-language-models-give-themselves-away-by-making-the-same-arguments/ since its verdicts can't be traced. GPTZero measures how predictable word choices are and how much that varies within a text, based on the idea that language models write more uniformly than humans. Originality.ai：http://originality.ai/ searches for statistical patterns it learned during training on human and AI-generated text. Ad","Despite these differences, all three detectors show the same pattern. They catch text from simple prompts almost every time but miss imitations far more often. Scientific writing, the genre where AI detection probably sees the most real-world use：https://the-decoder.com/grades-dropped-from-96-to-48-percent-when-a-brown-professor-made-students-take-the-exam-without-ai/, remains the hardest to flag correctly.","An earlier Authors Guild test：https://the-decoder.com/authors-guild-test-finds-some-ai-detectors-perfectly-identify-human-writing-while-others-fail-on-every-single-text/ found that Pangram and Originality.ai reliably classified human texts as human. The Epoch AI study fills in the other half of that picture: a low false-alarm rate on human writing says little about how many AI texts actually slip through.","Stay in the loop on AI. Clear, useful, no fluff.","Follow The Decoder for AI news, background stories and expert analyses.","The Decoder：https://the-decoder.com/"],"articleImages":[{"sourceUrl":"https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-detectors-false-negatives.png","alt":"The chart shows error rates for the three AI text detectors Pangram, GPTZero, and Originality.ai across three test categories: human writing (false positives), directly prompted AI text (false negatives), and AI text imitating a human author's style (false negatives).","afterParagraph":5,"url":"/media/articles/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/ce612522427964f1.png"}],"mediaStatus":"ok","articleBodyZh":["流行的 AI 文本检测器几乎可以以接近完美的准确率检测普通的 AI 生成文本。但当语言模型有意模仿特定作者的写作风格时，多达五分之一的 AI 文本会逃脱检测。科学写作是检测器最容易失败的领域。","Epoch AI 的一个研究团队测试了三种最广泛使用的 AI 文本检测器：Pangram（版本 3.3.2）、GPTZero（模型 2026-05-11-base）和 Originality.ai（Turbo 3.0.2）。测试涵盖三个类别：真实的人类写作、从简单提示生成的 AI 文本，以及故意模仿特定作者风格的 AI 文本。","该团队构建了一个包含 99 位作者的 495 段人类文本的语料库，平均分布在博客、小说和科学写作中。所有文本均在 ChatGPT 于 2022 年 11 月发布之前写成，这有效地排除了被语言模型污染的可能性。","在处理普通 AI 生成文本时，所有三种检测器的表现几乎无懈可击：https://epoch.ai/data-insights/ai-text-detection-challenges，假阴性率最高仅为 0.7%。大部分人类文本也能被正确分类。Pangram 和 GPTZero 没有产生任何误报。然而，Originality.ai 对 495 段人类文本中有 19 段误判为 AI 生成，假阳性率高达 3.8%，令人担忧。","当语言模型获得作者的写作样本作为参考资料时，这个结果就会发生变化。对于本次测试，三款前沿模型（Claude Opus 4.8、GPT-5.5 和 Gemini 3.1 Pro）各自收到一位作者的五段真实文本，然后被要求以相同风格撰写新文本。","根据 Epoch AI 的数据，在通过这种方式生成的 297 段文本中，平均有 38 段逃脱了检测，相当于约 13% 的假阴性率。Pangram 漏_detect 了 10% 的风格模仿文本，GPTZero 漏_detect 了 11%，Originality.ai 漏_detect 了 18%。","对于小说而言，三种检测器的假阴性率仅为 1% 至 5%。科学写作则表现出完全不同的情况。Pangram 未能识别出 25% 的风格模仿学术 AI 文本，GPTZero 漏_detect 了 24%，Originality.ai 漏_detect 了 29%。","在科学写作中，最糟糕的个体表现出现在特定的模型-文类组合中。根据已发布的数据，Pangram未能检测到48%的Gemini生成的学术段落：https://github.com/jaeholee-brown/ai-text-detectors。在Originality.ai上，39%的GPT-5.5学术文本未被检测到。Ad DEC_D_Incontent-2","Pangram使用一个在人工和机器生成文本上训练的神经网络，尽管其创始人曾称该系统为黑箱：https://the-decoder.com/pangram-ceo-says-language-models-give-themselves-away-by-making-the-same-arguments/，因为其判决无法追踪。GPTZero测量词语选择的可预测性及其在文本中的变化程度，基于语言模型比人类写得更统一的理念。Originality.ai：http://originality.ai/ 搜索其训练过程中从人工和AI生成文本中学到的统计模式。Ad","尽管存在这些差异，三种检测器表现出相同的模式。它们几乎每次都能捕捉到简单提示生成的文本，但更容易漏掉模仿文本。科学写作这一类型可能是AI检测在实际应用中使用最频繁的：https://the-decoder.com/grades-dropped-from-96-to-48-percent-when-a-brown-professor-made-students-take-the-exam-without-ai/，仍然是最难正确标记的。","早期的作者协会测试：https://the-decoder.com/authors-guild-test-finds-some-ai-detectors-perfectly-identify-human-writing-while-others-fail-on-every-single-text/ 发现，Pangram和Originality.ai能够可靠地将人类文本归类为人类写作。Epoch AI的研究补充了图景的另一半：对人类写作的假阳性率低，对AI文本实际漏检的数量几乎没有说明意义。","保持对AI的关注。清晰、有用、不空洞。","关注The Decoder获取AI新闻、背景故事和专家分析。","The Decoder：https://the-decoder.com/"],"translationStatus":"translated","bodyOrigin":"source-page","editorial":{"summary":"Aioga 编辑摘要：Epoch AI研究显示，Pangram、GPTZero和Originality.ai检测普通AI文本近乎完美，假阴性率最高仅0.7%。 Aioga 将其归入「论文研究」方向，重点关注它对真实使用和行业竞争的影响。","background":"背景分析：模型与研究类动态需要结合能力边界、开放方式、成本、可用性和真实任务表现判断，单项指标领先不等于已经形成稳定采用。","viewpoint":"Aioga 判断：这条动态更适合作为行业观察信号，当前信息足以建立线索，但不足以推导长期结论。","implications":"影响分析：对相关团队而言，短期应先核对来源、可用范围和实际成本，再判断是否值得接入或跟进。","nextStep":"后续观察：继续观察官方文档、实际可用性、价格变化、开发者反馈和竞品回应。","evidenceRefs":["title","summary","articleBody"],"confidence":"medium","status":"published","aiGenerated":false,"autoApproved":true,"generatedBy":"rule-safe-fallback","generatedAt":"2026-07-23T07:30:40.556Z","sourceHash":"1e017f89462ea217","validation":{"passed":true,"mode":"rule-safe-fallback","checks":["schema","length","source-attribution","no-html"]}},"tags":["论文研究","The Decoder：AI News（RSS）"],"translations":{"zh-CN":{"title":"AI文本检测器在模仿作者风格时漏检率飙升","summary":"Epoch AI研究显示，Pangram、GPTZero和Originality.ai检测普通AI文本近乎完美，假阴性率最高仅0.7%。但当Claude Opus 4.8等模型模仿特定作者风格写作时，平均13%的AI文本未被检出；科学写作类别中漏检率高达24%-29%，Pangram对Gemini生成的学术文本漏检率达48%。","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"AI文本检测器在模仿作者风格时漏检率飙升 - Aioga AI资讯","description":"Epoch AI研究显示，Pangram、GPTZero和Originality.ai检测普通AI文本近乎完美，假阴性率最高仅0.7%。但当Claude Opus 4.8等模型模仿特定作者风格写作时，平均13%的AI文本未被检出；科学写作类别中漏检率高达24%-29%，Pangram对Gemini生成的学术文本漏检率达48%。","url":"https://www.aioga.com/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/"},"en":{"title":"The miss rate of AI text detectors soars when imitating the author's style","summary":"Epoch AI research shows that Pangram, GPTZero, and Originality.ai detect ordinary AI-generated text almost perfectly, with a maximum false negative rate of only 0.7%. However, when models like Claude Opus 4.8 imitate the writing style of specific authors, an average of 13% of AI-generated text goes undetected; in the category of scientific writing, the missed detection rate is as high as 24%-29%, and Pangram's missed detection rate for academic texts generated by Gemini reaches 48%.","category":"Research","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"The miss rate of AI text detectors soars when imitating the author's style - Aioga AI News","description":"Epoch AI research shows that Pangram, GPTZero, and Originality.ai detect ordinary AI-generated text almost perfectly, with a maximum false negative rate of only 0.7%. However, when...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/en/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:41:49.588Z"},"ja":{"title":"AIテキスト検出器は、作者のスタイルを模倣する際に検出漏れ率が急上昇する","summary":"Epoch AIの研究によると、Pangram、GPTZero、Originality.aiは一般的なAIテキストの検出にほぼ完璧で、偽陰性率は最大でわずか0.7％です。しかし、Claude Opus 4.8などのモデルが特定の著者のスタイルを模倣して文章を書く場合、平均で13％のAIテキストが検出されません。科学的な文章のカテゴリーでは未検出率が24％～29％に達し、PangramはGeminiが生成した学術的テキストで未検出率が48％に達します。","category":"論文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"AIテキスト検出器は、作者のスタイルを模倣する際に検出漏れ率が急上昇する - Aioga AIニュース","description":"Epoch AIの研究によると、Pangram、GPTZero、Originality.aiは一般的なAIテキストの検出にほぼ完璧で、偽陰性率は最大でわずか0.7％です。しかし、Claude Opus 4.8などのモデルが特定の著者のスタイルを模倣して文章を書く場合、平均で13％のAIテキストが検出されません。科学的な文章のカテゴリーでは未検出率が24％～2...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/ja/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:41:57.039Z"},"ko":{"title":"AI 텍스트 탐지기는 작가의 스타일을 모방할 때 미검출률이 급증한다","summary":"Epoch AI 연구에 따르면, Pangram, GPTZero 및 Originality.ai는 일반 AI 텍스트를 거의 완벽하게 탐지하며, 가짜 음성률은 최대 0.7%에 불과하다. 하지만 Claude Opus 4.8과 같은 모델이 특정 작가의 스타일을 모방하여 글을 쓸 경우, 평균 13%의 AI 텍스트가 탐지되지 않는다; 과학 글쓰기 분야에서는 미탐지율이 24%-29%에 달하며, Pangram은 Gemini가 생성한 학술 텍스트의 48%를 미탐지한다.","category":"연구","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"AI 텍스트 탐지기는 작가의 스타일을 모방할 때 미검출률이 급증한다 - Aioga AI 뉴스","description":"Epoch AI 연구에 따르면, Pangram, GPTZero 및 Originality.ai는 일반 AI 텍스트를 거의 완벽하게 탐지하며, 가짜 음성률은 최대 0.7%에 불과하다. 하지만 Claude Opus 4.8과 같은 모델이 특정 작가의 스타일을 모방하여 글을 쓸 경우, 평균 13%의 AI 텍스트가 탐지되지 않는다;...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/ko/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:42:42.453Z"},"es":{"title":"La tasa de omisión de los detectores de texto de IA se dispara al imitar el estilo del autor","summary":"La investigación de Epoch AI muestra que Pangram, GPTZero y Originality.ai detectan textos ordinarios generados por IA casi a la perfección, con una tasa máxima de falsos negativos de solo el 0,7%. Pero cuando modelos como Claude Opus 4.8 imitan el estilo de un autor específico, el 13% de los textos generados por IA no se detectaron en promedio; en la categoría de escritura científica, la tasa de omisión es de hasta el 24%-29%, y Pangram no detectó el 48% de los textos académicos generados por Gemini.","category":"Investigación","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"La tasa de omisión de los detectores de texto de IA se dispara al imitar el estilo del autor - Aioga Noticias de IA","description":"La investigación de Epoch AI muestra que Pangram, GPTZero y Originality.ai detectan textos ordinarios generados por IA casi a la perfección, con una tasa máxima de falsos negativos...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/es/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:42:36.797Z"},"fr":{"title":"Le taux de non-détection des détecteurs de texte IA explose lorsqu'ils imitent le style de l'auteur","summary":"Les recherches d'Epoch AI montrent que Pangram, GPTZero et Originality.ai détectent les textes AI ordinaires de manière presque parfaite, avec un taux de faux négatifs maximum de seulement 0,7 %. Mais lorsque des modèles comme Claude Opus 4.8 imitent le style d'écriture d'auteurs spécifiques, en moyenne 13 % des textes AI ne sont pas détectés ; dans la catégorie de l'écriture scientifique, le taux de non-détection atteint 24 % à 29 %, et pour les textes académiques générés par Gemini, Pangram présente un taux de non-détection de 48 %.","category":"Recherche","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"Le taux de non-détection des détecteurs de texte IA explose lorsqu'ils imitent le style de l'auteur - Aioga Actualités IA","description":"Les recherches d'Epoch AI montrent que Pangram, GPTZero et Originality.ai détectent les textes AI ordinaires de manière presque parfaite, avec un taux de faux négatifs maximum de s...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/fr/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:43:24.305Z"},"de":{"title":"Die Fehlerrate von KI-Textdetektoren steigt stark an, wenn sie versuchen, den Stil des Autors zu imitieren","summary":"Epoch AI-Forschungen zeigen, dass Pangram, GPTZero und Originality.ai gewöhnliche AI-Texte nahezu perfekt erkennen, mit einer maximalen Rate falsch negativer Ergebnisse von nur 0,7%. Wenn jedoch Modelle wie Claude Opus 4.8 den Schreibstil bestimmter Autoren imitieren, werden durchschnittlich 13% der AI-Texte nicht erkannt; im Bereich wissenschaftliches Schreiben liegt die Nicht-Erkennungsrate bei 24%-29%, und bei von Gemini erzeugten akademischen Texten liegt die Nicht-Erkennungsrate von Pangram bei 48%.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"Die Fehlerrate von KI-Textdetektoren steigt stark an, wenn sie versuchen, den Stil des Autors zu imitieren - Aioga KI-News","description":"Epoch AI-Forschungen zeigen, dass Pangram, GPTZero und Originality.ai gewöhnliche AI-Texte nahezu perfekt erkennen, mit einer maximalen Rate falsch negativer Ergebnisse von nur 0,7...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/de/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:43:20.829Z"},"pt-BR":{"title":"A taxa de falhas dos detectores de texto de IA dispara ao imitar o estilo do autor","summary":"Pesquisas da Epoch AI mostram que Pangram, GPTZero e Originality.ai detectam textos comuns de IA quase com perfeição, com a taxa máxima de falsos negativos de apenas 0,7%. Mas quando modelos como Claude Opus 4.8 imitam o estilo de autores específicos, em média 13% dos textos de IA não são detectados; na categoria de escrita científica, a taxa de detecção falha chega a 24% a 29%, e o Pangram apresenta uma taxa de falsos negativos de 48% para textos acadêmicos gerados pelo Gemini.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"A taxa de falhas dos detectores de texto de IA dispara ao imitar o estilo do autor - Aioga Notícias de IA","description":"Pesquisas da Epoch AI mostram que Pangram, GPTZero e Originality.ai detectam textos comuns de IA quase com perfeição, com a taxa máxima de falsos negativos de apenas 0,7%. Mas quan...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/pt-BR/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:44:05.636Z"},"ru":{"title":"Уровень пропусков у детекторов текста ИИ резко возрастает при имитации стиля автора","summary":"Исследование Epoch AI показывает, что Pangram, GPTZero и Originality.ai почти идеально выявляют обычные тексты, созданные ИИ, при этом максимальный уровень ложных отрицательных результатов составляет всего 0,7%. Однако когда модели, такие как Claude Opus 4.8, имитируют стиль конкретного автора, в среднем 13% текстов ИИ остаются не выявленными; в категории научных текстов уровень пропусков достигает 24%-29%, при этом Pangram пропускает 48% научных текстов, созданных Gemini.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"Уровень пропусков у детекторов текста ИИ резко возрастает при имитации стиля автора - Aioga Новости ИИ","description":"Исследование Epoch AI показывает, что Pangram, GPTZero и Originality.ai почти идеально выявляют обычные тексты, созданные ИИ, при этом максимальный уровень ложных отрицательных рез...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/ru/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:44:06.031Z"},"ar":{"title":"معدل الفشل في الاكتشاف في أجهزة كشف النصوص الذكية يرتفع عند محاكاة أسلوب المؤلف","summary":"أظهرت أبحاث Epoch AI أن Pangram و GPTZero و Originality.ai قادرون على كشف النصوص العادية التي تنتجها الذكاء الاصطناعي بشكل شبه مثالي، حيث تبلغ أعلى نسبة نتائج سلبية كاذبة 0.7٪ فقط. لكن عندما تقوم نماذج مثل Claude Opus 4.8 بمحاكاة أسلوب مؤلف معين في الكتابة، لا يتم اكتشاف متوسط 13٪ من النصوص التي تنتجها الذكاء الاصطناعي؛ وفي فئة الكتابة العلمية، تصل نسبة النصوص غير المكتشفة إلى 24٪-29٪، أما Pangram فبلغت نسبة النصوص الأكاديمية التي ينتجها Gemini ولم يتم اكتشافها 48٪.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"معدل الفشل في الاكتشاف في أجهزة كشف النصوص الذكية يرتفع عند محاكاة أسلوب المؤلف - Aioga أخبار الذكاء الاصطناعي","description":"أظهرت أبحاث Epoch AI أن Pangram و GPTZero و Originality.ai قادرون على كشف النصوص العادية التي تنتجها الذكاء الاصطناعي بشكل شبه مثالي، حيث تبلغ أعلى نسبة نتائج سلبية كاذبة 0.7٪ فقط....","url":"https://www.aioga.com/ar/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:44:49.596Z"},"hi":{"title":"AI पाठ जांचक लेखक की शैली की नकल करते समय छूट की दर में तेजी से वृद्धि करता है","summary":"Epoch AI के अध्ययन से पता चलता है कि Pangram, GPTZero और Originality.ai सामान्य AI टेक्स्ट का लगभग पूरी तरह से पता लगा सकते हैं, झूठी नकारात्मक दर अधिकतम केवल 0.7% है। लेकिन जब Claude Opus 4.8 जैसे मॉडल विशिष्ट लेखक की शैली की नकल करके लिखते हैं, तो औसतन 13% AI टेक्स्ट का पता नहीं लगाया जाता; वैज्ञानिक लेखन श्रेणी में छूट दर 24%-29% तक है, और Pangram द्वारा Gemini के द्वारा उत्पन्न शैक्षणिक टेक्स्ट की छूट दर 48% तक पहुँच जाती है।","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"AI पाठ जांचक लेखक की शैली की नकल करते समय छूट की दर में तेजी से वृद्धि करता है - Aioga AI समाचार","description":"Epoch AI के अध्ययन से पता चलता है कि Pangram, GPTZero और Originality.ai सामान्य AI टेक्स्ट का लगभग पूरी तरह से पता लगा सकते हैं, झूठी नकारात्मक दर अधिकतम केवल 0.7% है। लेकिन जब Cla...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/hi/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:44:52.510Z"},"it":{"title":"Il tasso di mancata rilevazione dei rilevatori di testi AI aumenta vertiginosamente quando imitano lo stile degli autori","summary":"La ricerca di Epoch AI mostra che Pangram, GPTZero e Originality.ai rilevano i testi normali generati dall'IA quasi perfettamente, con un tasso massimo di falsi negativi dello 0,7%. Tuttavia, quando modelli come Claude Opus 4.8 imitano lo stile di scrittura di specifici autori, in media il 13% dei testi generati dall'IA non viene rilevato; per la categoria della scrittura scientifica il tasso di mancata rilevazione arriva al 24%-29%, mentre Pangram non rileva il 48% dei testi accademici generati da Gemini.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"Il tasso di mancata rilevazione dei rilevatori di testi AI aumenta vertiginosamente quando imitano lo stile degli autori - Aioga Notizie IA","description":"La ricerca di Epoch AI mostra che Pangram, GPTZero e Originality.ai rilevano i testi normali generati dall'IA quasi perfettamente, con un tasso massimo di falsi negativi dello 0,7%...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/it/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:45:34.938Z"},"nl":{"title":"Het ongekende detectieniveau van AI-tekstherkenners stijgt sterk bij het nabootsen van de schrijfstijl van de auteur","summary":"Epoch AI-onderzoek toont aan dat Pangram, GPTZero en Originality.ai gewone AI-tekst bijna perfect detecteren, met een maximale vals-negatief percentage van slechts 0,7%. Maar wanneer modellen zoals Claude Opus 4.8 de schrijfstijl van specifieke auteurs imiteren, wordt gemiddeld 13% van de AI-tekst niet gedetecteerd; in de categorie wetenschappelijk schrijven loopt het niet-detectiepercentage op tot 24%-29%, en bij Pangram bedraagt het niet-detectiepercentage van door Gemini gegenereerde academische teksten 48%.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"Het ongekende detectieniveau van AI-tekstherkenners stijgt sterk bij het nabootsen van de schrijfstijl van de auteur - Aioga AI-nieuws","description":"Epoch AI-onderzoek toont aan dat Pangram, GPTZero en Originality.ai gewone AI-tekst bijna perfect detecteren, met een maximale vals-negatief percentage van slechts 0,7%. Maar wanne...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/nl/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:45:32.288Z"},"tr":{"title":"Yapay zeka metin dedektörlerinde, yazarın tarzını taklit ederken kaçırma oranı fırlıyor","summary":"Epoch AI araştırmaları, Pangram, GPTZero ve Originality.ai'nin sıradan AI metinlerini neredeyse mükemmel şekilde tespit ettiğini, sahte negatif oranının en fazla %0,7 olduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak Claude Opus 4.8 gibi modeller belirli yazarların üslubunu taklit ederek yazdığında, AI metinlerinin ortalama %13'ü tespit edilememektedir; bilimsel yazım kategorisinde kaçırılma oranı %24-%29'a ulaşmakta ve Pangram, Gemini tarafından üretilen akademik metinlerde %48 oranında kaçırma yapmaktadır.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"Yapay zeka metin dedektörlerinde, yazarın tarzını taklit ederken kaçırma oranı fırlıyor - Aioga AI Haberleri","description":"Epoch AI araştırmaları, Pangram, GPTZero ve Originality.ai'nin sıradan AI metinlerini neredeyse mükemmel şekilde tespit ettiğini, sahte negatif oranının en fazla %0,7 olduğunu göst...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/tr/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:46:14.981Z"},"vi":{"title":"Tỷ lệ bỏ sót của bộ phát hiện văn bản AI tăng vọt khi bắt chước phong cách của tác giả","summary":"Nghiên cứu của Epoch AI cho thấy, Pangram, GPTZero và Originality.ai phát hiện văn bản AI thông thường gần như hoàn hảo, tỷ lệ âm tính giả cao nhất chỉ là 0,7%. Nhưng khi các mô hình như Claude Opus 4.8 bắt chước phong cách viết của các tác giả cụ thể, trung bình 13% văn bản AI không được phát hiện; trong hạng mục viết khoa học, tỷ lệ bỏ sót lên tới 24%-29%, và Pangram đối với văn bản học thuật do Gemini tạo ra có tỷ lệ bỏ sót lên đến 48%.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"Tỷ lệ bỏ sót của bộ phát hiện văn bản AI tăng vọt khi bắt chước phong cách của tác giả - Tin tức AI Aioga","description":"Nghiên cứu của Epoch AI cho thấy, Pangram, GPTZero và Originality.ai phát hiện văn bản AI thông thường gần như hoàn hảo, tỷ lệ âm tính giả cao nhất chỉ là 0,7%. Nhưng khi các mô hì...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/vi/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:46:15.608Z"},"id":{"title":"Tingkat kegagalan deteksi AI meningkat saat meniru gaya penulis","summary":"Penelitian Epoch AI menunjukkan bahwa Pangram, GPTZero, dan Originality.ai hampir sempurna dalam mendeteksi teks AI biasa, dengan tingkat negatif palsu tertinggi hanya 0,7%. Namun, ketika model seperti Claude Opus 4.8 meniru gaya penulisan penulis tertentu, rata-rata 13% teks AI tidak terdeteksi; dalam kategori penulisan ilmiah, tingkat kegagalan deteksi mencapai 24%-29%, dan Pangram memiliki tingkat kegagalan deteksi sebesar 48% untuk teks akademik yang dihasilkan oleh Gemini.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"Tingkat kegagalan deteksi AI meningkat saat meniru gaya penulis - Berita AI Aioga","description":"Penelitian Epoch AI menunjukkan bahwa Pangram, GPTZero, dan Originality.ai hampir sempurna dalam mendeteksi teks AI biasa, dengan tingkat negatif palsu tertinggi hanya 0,7%. Namun,...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/id/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:47:03.253Z"},"th":{"title":"อัตราการพลาดของตัวตรวจจับข้อความ AI พุ่งสูงขึ้นเมื่อเลียนแบบสไตล์ของผู้แต่ง","summary":"การวิจัยของ Epoch AI แสดงให้เห็นว่า Pangram, GPTZero และ Originality.ai ตรวจจับข้อความ AI ธรรมดาได้เกือบสมบูรณ์ โดยอัตราผลลบเทียมสูงสุดเพียง 0.7% แต่เมื่อโมเดลอย่าง Claude Opus 4.8 เลียนแบบสไตล์การเขียนของผู้เขียนเฉพาะ ค่าเฉลี่ย 13% ของข้อความ AI ไม่ถูกตรวจพบ; ในหมวดการเขียนเชิงวิทยาศาสตร์ อัตราการพลาดตรวจพบสูงถึง 24%-29% โดย Pangram มีอัตราการพลาดตรวจพบข้อความทางวิชาการที่สร้างโดย Gemini ถึง 48%.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"อัตราการพลาดของตัวตรวจจับข้อความ AI พุ่งสูงขึ้นเมื่อเลียนแบบสไตล์ของผู้แต่ง - ข่าว AI Aioga","description":"การวิจัยของ Epoch AI แสดงให้เห็นว่า Pangram, GPTZero และ Originality.ai ตรวจจับข้อความ AI ธรรมดาได้เกือบสมบูรณ์ โดยอัตราผลลบเทียมสูงสุดเพียง 0.7% แต่เมื่อโมเดลอย่าง Claude Opus 4.8...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/th/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:47:07.536Z"},"pl":{"title":"Wskaźnik przeoczeń w wykrywaczach tekstów AI gwałtownie rośnie podczas naśladowania stylu autora","summary":"Badania Epoch AI wykazują, że Pangram, GPTZero i Originality.ai wykrywają zwykłe teksty AI prawie perfekcyjnie, a najwyższa wartość fałszywie negatywna wynosi zaledwie 0,7%. Jednak gdy modele takie jak Claude Opus 4.8 naśladują styl konkretnych autorów, średnio 13% tekstów AI nie zostaje wykrytych; w kategorii pisania naukowego wskaźnik niedetekcji sięga 24%-29%, a Pangram dla tekstów naukowych generowanych przez Gemini osiąga wskaźnik niedetekcji 48%.","category":"论文研究","source":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","aggregationSource":"The Decoder：AI News（RSS）","pageTitle":"Wskaźnik przeoczeń w wykrywaczach tekstów AI gwałtownie rośnie podczas naśladowania stylu autora - Aioga Wiadomości AI","description":"Badania Epoch AI wykazują, że Pangram, GPTZero i Originality.ai wykrywają zwykłe teksty AI prawie perfekcyjnie, a najwyższa wartość fałszywie negatywna wynosi zaledwie 0,7%. Jednak...","url":"https://www.aioga.com/pl/news/cmrrkizkj06hqbihkhiuo2r9h/","contentTranslated":true,"sourceHash":"684c8cc56501b453","translatedAt":"2026-07-23T00:47:53.463Z"}}}}