A survey by Adaptavist shows that about 65% of white-collar workers often miss the way they worked before AI appeared. About one-third of respondents are w...
技巧观点IT之家(RSS)
Today AI Intelligence Brief
A survey by Adaptavist shows that about 65% of white-collar workers often miss the way they worked
before AI appeared. About one-third of respondents are willing to give up generative AI because it "undermines creativity," and nearly half of the respondents said they need to spend more time verifying the accuracy of AI content. The study also found that while AI improves the quality of creativity, it weakens creative diversity, and companies, charging per token, require employees to reduce the use of AI.
Original Article Excerpt
IT之家:https://www.ithome.com/ 7 月 28 日消息,当地时间 26 日,据英国《金融时报》报道,咨询公司 Adaptavist 调查发现,约 65% 的白领 经常怀念 AI 出现前的工作方式 。约三分之一的受访者因为“会削弱创造力”而 愿意放弃生成式 AI ;也有约三分之一的人担心 AI 遭到滥用 。近一半受访者表示,为了核实 AI 生成内容是否准确,自己被迫投入更多时间,结果 与 AI 减少重复劳动的承诺背道而驰 。
AI 对创造力的影响同样引发担忧。一项针对普通人创意写作的研究发现,生成式 AI 虽然能够提供更多剧情转折,却也让 故事越来越相似、创意越来越趋同 。
IT之家从报道中获悉,宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院另一项关于创新的研究也得出类似结论:AI 虽然提高了创意质量, 却削弱了创意多样性 。其中一位研究作者警告:“如果你把 ChatGPT 当成唯一的创意顾问,很快就会发现 自己的点子越来越少 ,因为 AI 给出的想法彼此太相似了。”
企业不断调整 AI 政策,也让员工无所适从。企业起初鼓励员工利用 AI 自动完成工作、大胆尝试各种应用,然而随着科技企业改为 按 Token 收费 ,企业又开始要求员工减少使用 AI,以控制成本。
与品牌合作管理历史档案和企业传承业务的 History Factory CEO 杰森 · 德雷塞尔表示,这种“怀旧”反映了人们在面对快速变化时, 对稳定、自主权和经济信心的渴望 ,AI 进一步强化了这种感受。因为 AI 不仅改变了人们的工作方式,也改变了人们的价值如何被衡量。
Intelligence Assessment
Aioga 编辑摘要
Aioga 编辑摘要:Adaptavist 调查显示,约 65% 的白领经常怀念 AI 出现前的工作方式。 Aioga 将其归入「技巧观点」方向,重点关注它对真实使用和行业竞争的影响。
The readable text on this page was extracted from the public source and organized with attribution, publication time and the original link. Copyright remains with the original author and publisher.
A survey by Adaptavist shows that about 65% of white-collar workers often miss the way they worked before AI appeared. About one-third of respondents are w...
IT之家(RSS)2026-07-28T00:11:41.000Z
Scan to open this article
Aioga aggregates global AI updates and preserves source information for verification and citation.