他们可能剽窃了：https://x.com/thom_wolf/status/2097215782484607029?s=61 两位顶尖数学家，其中一位在 NYU Courant，另一位在 Anthropic，关于一个千禧年奖问题：
最后一段重点引述了 OpenAI 给其中一位数学家的内容，带有勒索的意味。你可以在这里阅读 Tristan Buckmaster 对其与 OpenAI 不愉快互动的完整叙述：https://cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/statement.pdf。白宫 Stephen Miller 的妻子 Katie Miller 认为这都是一种模式：https://x.com/katiemiller/status/2097289742979141828?s=61。
前几天我在想，前沿实验室的所有营销炒作是如何淹没了理性对话的声音，比如我尊重的那些人：Gary Marcus、Cal Newport、Andre Ng 和 Fei Fei Li，仅举几例。
正是阅读/聆听他们的观点让我在经历另一波“AI 失控”或“我们已达到 AGI”新闻狂潮后保持冷静。
For something like a week, there been a constant stream of reports about OpenAI’s apparent misconduct: around the hacks, around apparent coverups, possible data fudging — and maybe even intellectual theft with a hint of extortion. Not to mention a bullshit game in which, in (apparent) concert with Jensen, OpenAI tried to pretend Astra was tantamount to AGI.
The story that broke this morning—still waiting for OpenAI’s full response—blew my mind. And yet also left me unsurprised.
Here are nine things I learned just in the last week :
The widely discussed and worrisome Hugging Face incident wasn’t the only one. Their software also hacked a German website：https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/f6f7de67-a9b2-42a3-9ee5-3cd53be9a5d0 .
There are indications that they knew about the German incident weeks ago and didn’t report it：https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/openai-agents-hijacked-german-website-previously-undisclosed-ai-breakout-this-2026-09-04/ . Instead, they appear to have covered it up. Per Reuters,
As Shakeel Hashim summarizes, their choices put others (including Hugging Face) at risk.
It’s come to light that they withheld information from Congress:
When Altman was asked on July 29 whether there were other incidents, he was coy：https://x.com/alanhe/status/2082523623294747001?s=61 , saying “there could be” when he likely already knew for a fact that there had been.
OpenAI’s President, Greg Brockman, has been on a campaign trying to imply that Astra is AGI (or one model away from being so).
Multiple reports, even from people who are very AI bullish, like “@scaling_o1” on X, suggest that this is marketing bullshit. In one tweet, he wrote “ after having burnt twice through my Pro limits using Astra exclusively, I can say that I don’t feel the AGI：https://x.com/scaling01/status/2096925646404403598?s=61 ”, in another he wrote this:
AI forecaster Peter Wildeford, often more bullish about AI progress than me, wrote this:
Jun Song, an AI developer, wrote this
Some were just funny, like GPT-6 Astra’s video rendering of a Cheetah in motion.
Artificial Analysis find the whole Claude vs Astra thing a tossup：https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/artificial-analysis-intelligence-index-v4-3?utm_source=article_alerts&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=artificial-analysis-intelligence-index-v4-3 , concluding “[O]verall scores reflect different strengths. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on AA-Briefcase and SciCode, while GPT-6 Astra scores higher on Terminal-Bench v4.0 and AutomationBench-AA Score.” The idea that Astra is in some completely new league is preposterous. (Jensen should be ashamed for having fed into it. It will be interesting to see if his credibility takes a hit.)
On a personal note, as a scientist I am especially offended by “we’re in the AGI era” PR blitz because it both distorts and dismisses all the thinking that earlier scholars and technologists like Goertzel, Legg, and Voss (and later folks like Bengio, Hendrycks, and myself) did in formulating the very concept of AGI. More about that in a future essay.
Much was made of their scoring 99.9% on ARC-AGI-3, but apparently that required an in-house (and likely special-purpose) harness. It’s not a number that ARC-AGI themselves could achieve with the out-of-the-box model:
This is not even the only game with numbers they played in the last few days:
They may have ripped off：https://x.com/thom_wolf/status/2097215782484607029?s=61 a pair of leading mathematicians, one at NYU Courant, the other at Anthropic, on a Millennium Prize Problem:
The last highlighted bit, a quote from OpenAI to one of the mathematicians, smacks of extortion. You can read Tristan Buckmaster’s full account of his unpleasant interaction with OpenAI here：https://cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/statement.pdf . Katie Miller (wife of the White House’s Stephen Miller) suggests it’s all part a pattern：https://x.com/katiemiller/status/2097289742979141828?s=61 .
We do need to hear OpenAI’s side of this story (which they say is forthcoming) but it is absolutely-no-scientist-will-work-with-them-again level bad if true.
I may even have missed some other recent charges of misconduct. And who knows what else they haven’t disclosed.
And it all reeks of desperation: a desperate, money-burning company running out of time and doing everything it can to manipulate the narrative before its planned IPO.
In their lawsuit with Elon Musk, OpenAI was saved from further judgment by a statute of limitations. But the testimony — from all the diverse people who called Sam Altman a liar, from former employees like Murati and Sutskever to the former board members — was damning. So was OpenAI President Greg Brockman’s own diary.
Nobody should be surprised by now that they play fast and loose.
I would not expect to see this much (apparent) foul play at a used car dealership; or least not at one that expected to stay open for long. In a company that could “cause significant harm to the world”, in Sam Altman’s own words, it is unacceptable.
I have said it before and will say it again: OpenAI should be shut down until there are changes at the top; both Altman and Brockman should go.
A further sign of a trouble corporate culture, again pointing to the top, is that more at least sixteen top executives, from the Heads of Science, Robotics, Sora, Safety, and Preparendness, to the AI ethics lead, to the Chief Revenue Office and Chief Operating Officer, CEO of AGI Deployment and Chief Revenue Officer, have departed since January：https://x.com/katiemiller/status/2092495359566090662?s=61 , despite the looming IPO.
In taking no action, OpenAI’s board is being absolutely irresponsible.
P.S. Headline/PSA from the San Francisco Chronicle：https://www.sfchronicle.com/outdoors/article/shasta-climbers-rescued-chatgpt-22414629.php :
P.P.S. Passing along this AI-generated timeline, perhaps approximately correct but not fully accurate, of the HF incident. Tl;dr: they knew for months and kept going and kept quiet.
"We've achieved AGI!". No - you have achieved a model that is 5% more capable than the last one and 55% more expensive.
The other day I was thinking how all the marketing hype from the frontier labs has drowned the voices of reason on AI, like those I respect: Gary Marcus, Cal Newport, Andre Ng and Fei Fei Li, to name a few.
It's reading/listening to them that grounds me after another slew of "AI going rogue", or "we've reached AGI" news flurry.
扫码直达文章详情