关于 AI 写作的 13 条信念

迈克·泰勒（Mike Taylor）是 Every 的评估负责人，也是《生成式人工智能提示工程》（O’Reilly）的合著者。

我如何从“这是一团糟”变成愿意以自己名字发表的作品

我们《How We》系列：https://every.to/p/what-writers-who-use-ai-want-you-to 的作者们对 AI 的使用有着非常不同的界限。有些人只用它做研究和编辑，但不会让它写一句话。迈克·泰勒（Mike Taylor）：https://every.to/@mike_2114 却会。他几乎使用模型来起草他发表的所有内容。他的标准是，如果读者来与他争论，他是否能为这些想法辩护。

迈克分享了背后的13个信念。他在提示中放入更多自己的材料，而不是让模型写。他完全保留社交帖子为自己创作。有些做法与系列中大多数作者的工作方式相悖，这也是值得阅读的原因。——凯特·李（Kate Lee）：https://every.to/@kate_1767

我刚完成了我的第二本书：https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/context-engineering-with/0642572261603/ 与出版商 O’Reilly 合作，该出版社不允许使用 AI 写作，而这是我最后一次同意手动写作。传统写作方式感觉就像在有文字处理器的情况下使用打字机，而且写出的内容并不比用 AI 写的好。

自从 2020 年 GPT-3 发布以来，我一直在尝试 AI 写作，当时 Copy.ai 向所有未能进入 Y Combinator：https://x.com/PaulYacoubian/status/1329777522158911492?s=20 的人免费提供账户。2023 年 GPT-4 发布：https://every.to/chain-of-thought/gpt-4-a-copilot-for-the-mind 时，我开发了一个写作流程：https://www.saxifrage.xyz/post/ai-writer，通过了图灵测试：朋友和同事无法分辨出不是我写的，这足够让我沮丧，以至于我停止了写作。

今天我写作比以往任何时候都多，因为我形成了一系列关于 AI 写作的信念，这让我从“这是一团糟”走到“还行，不错”，现在变成了“这更好”。如果你过去尝试过 AI 写作，但因为感觉不道德而停止，我希望这能让你重新考虑。

现在每个人都是建设者。Every All Access：https://every.to/builder-pack 可以让你获得完整会员资格以及建设者礼包——价值超过 9,000 美元的我们使用的工具积分。

登录即可免费阅读并获取你的 AI 评估提示。

Mike Taylor is the head of evals at Every and a co-author of "Prompt Engineering for Generative AI" (O’Reilly).

How I went from ‘this is slop’ to work I’m willing to publish under my name

Writers in our How We：https://every.to/p/what-writers-who-use-ai-want-you-to Write Now：https://every.to/guides/compound-writing?utm_cta_source=post_4471_post_body_guide_to_compound_writing_1 series have drawn very different lines around AI. Some use it for research and editing but won’t let it write a sentence. Mike Taylor：https://every.to/@mike_2114 will. He uses models to draft almost everything he publishes. His test is whether he could defend the ideas if a reader showed up to argue.

Mike shares the 13 beliefs behind that. He puts more of his own material into the prompt than he asks the model to write. He keeps social posts entirely his own. Some of this cuts against how most of the series’ writers work, which is what makes it worth reading. — Kate Lee：https://every.to/@kate_1767

I just finished my second book：https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/context-engineering-with/0642572261603/ with publisher O’Reilly, who doesn’t allow using AI to write, and it’s the last thing I’ll agree to write manually. Writing the traditional way feels like using a typewriter when I have a word processor, and the output isn’t any better than what I write with AI.

I’ve been experimenting with AI writing since GPT-3 came out in 2020, when Copy.ai was giving out free accounts to everyone who failed to get into Y Combinator：https://x.com/PaulYacoubian/status/1329777522158911492?s=20 . When GPT-4：https://every.to/chain-of-thought/gpt-4-a-copilot-for-the-mind came out in 2023, I developed a writing process：https://www.saxifrage.xyz/post/ai-writer that passed the Turing test: friends and colleagues couldn’t tell it wasn’t me, and that was depressing enough that I stopped writing.

Today I write more than ever, because I’ve developed a series of beliefs about AI writing that have moved me from “this is slop” to “ok not bad” and now “this is better.” If you’ve experimented with AI writing in the past and stopped because it felt unethical, I hope this makes you reconsider.

Everyone’s a builder now. Every All Access：https://every.to/builder-pack gets you the full membership plus the Builder Pack—$9,000+ in credits for the tools we build with.

Sign in to read for free and get your AI assessment prompt.